News
 | 
Tech
 | 
Forums
 | 
Installation Centers
 | 
Repair/Rebuild Svc.
 | 
Product Search
 | 
Vehicle Registry
Superchargers Online - The World's Largest Supercharger Resource
Phone: 661-526-1206 
My Basket  |   Checkout  |   My Account  |   Order Tracking  

  Home  
  Superchargers  
  Head Units  
  Mounting Kits  
  Intercoolers  
  Fuel Upgrades  
  Accessories  
    
SuperchargersOnline
SuperchargersOnline
Home | Profile | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
 All Forums
 General Forums
 General Supercharger Tech
 How much air does a 4/71 displace per revolution?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

valvebounce
Tire Chirper

New Zealand
17 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2009 :  00:57:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
probably a dumbass question, but I gotta ask. I'm toying with the idea of slapping one onto a chrysler 318 that i'm in the throws of freshening up at the moment. Either that, or maybe a pair of toyota S/C14's.

Mick
Tire Chirper

Australia
44 Posts

Posted - 06/12/2009 :  20:35:42  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
The original numbering was for 2 stroke diesels, ie: a 4 cylinder with 71 cubic inches per cylinder, although I don't think it was a direct multiplication of 4 x 71.
Go to Top of Page

valvebounce
Tire Chirper

New Zealand
17 Posts

Posted - 06/13/2009 :  01:02:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
curious. With a two stroke an engine displaces is dispalcement per revolution. But four stroke are half this.
Go to Top of Page

Mick
Tire Chirper

Australia
44 Posts

Posted - 06/13/2009 :  17:46:04  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I remember years ago when I was a kid one of my mates fathers showing me a 2 stroke, supercharged diesel 6 cylinder. (6-71 blower maybe!) Any way, being a diesel, they didn't have to worry about blowing fuel/air charge out the exhaust ports, so the blower charge was actually used to clear the cylinders of exhaust by blowing through. Also the crankcase wasn't used to transfer fuel/air charge to the cylinder as in a normal petrol 2 stroke, the compressed charge blew straight into the cylinder.
Go to Top of Page

valvebounce
Tire Chirper

New Zealand
17 Posts

Posted - 06/13/2009 :  22:31:54  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
that makes sence. You'd have to have your injector timing arranged so that no fuel was delivered untill the exhaust port had been closed.
Some blokes on a hotrod site I visit now and again reckon a 4/71 will be okay on a smallblock of 300ish cubes.
Go to Top of Page

Mick
Tire Chirper

Australia
44 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2009 :  03:15:16  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
From Wikipedia!
The GMC types are rated according to how many two-stroke cylinders, and the size of those cylinders, it is designed to scavenge. GMC has made 2-71, 3-71, 4-71, and the famed 6-71 blowers. For example, a 6-71 blower is designed to scavenge six cylinders of 71 cubic inches each and would be used on a two-stroke diesel of 426 cubic inches, which is designated a 6-71; the blower takes this same designation. However, because 6-71 is actually the engine's designation, the actual displacement is less than the simple multiplication would suggest. A 6-71 actually pumps 339 cubic inches per revolution.

(I guess that makes the 4/71 about 226 cubic inches per revolution)
Go to Top of Page

valvebounce
Tire Chirper

New Zealand
17 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2009 :  04:08:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
well a 318 is only gonna push 159 cubes per revolution. So even at 1:1. it'll make okay boost. (well enough for an un beefed up motor anyway!)
Go to Top of Page

Mick
Tire Chirper

Australia
44 Posts

Posted - 06/27/2009 :  17:17:58  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Without taking losses into account, it should make around 6 psi.
Go to Top of Page

valvebounce
Tire Chirper

New Zealand
17 Posts

Posted - 02/06/2010 :  17:22:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
rebumping my old thread,
excluding losses and inefficiencies, what boost would this blower make geared 1:1 on a 245ci motor?
122.5ci per rpm. Have to be around 10+psi wouldn't it?
Go to Top of Page

Mick
Tire Chirper

Australia
44 Posts

Posted - 02/09/2010 :  16:59:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
About 12.5 if my maths didn't let me down. At 1:1 the blower is turning pretty slow, which means a lot of time for leakage passed the rotors. You're better off with a small blower turning fast than a big blower turning slow.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
SuperchargersOnline © SuperchargersOnline Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
Automotive Banners .com Results-oriented banner exchange
  Contact Us | Terms and Conditions | Privacy | Dealers

  © 2003 SuperchargersOnline.com. (tm) All rights reserved.

Tell a friend about Superchargers OnlineTell a Friend | Print page on Superchargers OnlinePrinter Friendly Version